Sometimes I wonder if there aren't more aspiring writers out there, intent on publishing their stories and novels by whatever means (even via self-publishing), than there are readers. Especially -- self-involved or naive writers vs. discriminating readers. I get a certain number of self-published books in the mail for listing on Locus Online (and I list them; you've seen them), and I've just finished a survey of short fiction published in 2005 (for Locus
Magazine's February issue) that made note of certain websites that enable anyone to self-publish their stories (e.g. SFF World
). I can't help but wonder, every time I see one of these writers' works, how many of these writers bother to read their compatriots, much less read widely in the field, much less are familiar with the works of the generally acknowledged best writers in the field, much less are familiar with the generally acknowledged canonical books of the field, much less are familiar with the generally acknowledged canonical books of contemporary or world literature.
And still feel they have something new to add, that commands your (my) attention?
Vanishingly few, I'd suppose. Most of them, instead, feel the 'restless urge to write' and implicitly suppose that there's an audience out there waiting for what they have to say.
But from a reader's standpoint, it boils down to the question -- Why should I read your story or book, rather than anything else??
I've been doing my annual survey/tallies of short fiction for many years -- over a decade -- and the bottom line result is that there are more stories published every year. Magazines and websites come and go, and anthology trends wax and wane, but somehow, the story totals increase every year. Where are all those writers coming from... if not from readers? The circulations of the professional magazines are declining every year!
I suppose the trend is due to technological advances -- it's easier and easier to self-publish, via POD, or websites.
Still, what are those writers thinking? Do they realize what they're asking, what their odds are?
OK, I'm being harsh, too cynical. Many writers of works that have become regarded as best or canonical started out as unknown as all the currently self-publishing wannabes. Give 'em a chance.
And beginning writers know that they're not really in competition with the grand masters. They're in competition with each other. Time will pass. A few of them will survive to become professionals, and fewer of them will survive to become recognized as masters, and a few in a generation will even survive to become grand masters, authors of canonical works.
Still, as a reader, one has to prioritize. Life is short. After a certain amount of time being receptive to newbies, one realizes there is only time to read so many more books, ever. Frankly, this was a factor in my giving up trying to review short fiction, 4 years ago now, feeling the obligation to spend much time every month reading as many new magazines and anthologies as I could. There's only so much time, and there are so many more rewarding things to read. OR: Maybe it's more meaningful to manage information that helps other people decide what they should read. Maybe that was it.