Thursday, February 26, 2004

Affiliations and Adaptations 

I promise not to become preoccupied with this website Hugo debate, and I hadn't intended to post anything about it to SMOFs at all -- it's not really my place -- but I couldn't help responding to this exchange between David Dyer-Bennet and Leroy Berven over the issue I numbered second in the previous post: the recurring idea that one website Hugo category isn't enough, because big guns like Scifi.com, or Locus Online, which for whatever reason are perceived as having unfair advantage over more 'fannish' websites, would dominate the category.

>Quoth David Dyer-Bennet:
>> By the way, how do you propose to distinguish "fan" from "pro" sites?
>> How would you categorize the following: www.tor.com, www.baen.com,
>> dragaera.info, www.neilgaiman.com, www.dendarii.com, isfdb.tamu.edu,
>> www.locusmag.com.
>> (Off the top of my head, I'd categorize them as pro, pro, fan, pro,
>> fan, fan, semi-pro.
>So would I.
>> Locusmag would go to full pro if there had to be
>> only two categories. But I don't know what the rule is that sorts
>> them that way.)
>Given my druthers, my own preference would be that we not _have_ a need
>to develop one. OTOH, distinguishing "fan" from "pro" seems to be a
>process best conducted in the spirit of the U.S. Supreme Court
>justice's well-known definition of obscenity.
>Leroy Berven

I responded that it would require curious, counter-intuitive definitions of "semi-professional" and "professional" to nominate Locus Magazine as a "semi-pro" magazine --though it provides full-time employment for a publisher, an editor, and several full-time staff-- while designating Locus Online a "professional website" --though the income it brings in barely covers site expenses, and certainly doesn't provide full-time employment for anyone.

Though I do understand the desire for some distinction. Sponsorship, or affiliation, perhaps? SciFi Channel supports SciFi.com, and Locus Magazine supports Locus Online by virtues of name, information, and contacts, even if not any significant money. Best Affiliated Website and Best Independent Website, perhaps, analogous to Adapted and Original Screenplays?

As I've typed this post, David Dyer-Bennet has responded to the listserve with a detailed response that finds my suggestion unpersuasive. Oh well. Just a thought. I should stay out of this.
Comments: Post a Comment

king under the dome

doctorow makers

banks transition

kress steal sky

atwood year flood

roberts yellow blue tibia

wilson julian comstock

 ness ask and answer

collins catching fire

collins hunger games

sawyer flashforward

baker hotel

disch proteus

tan tales

mazzucchelli asterios

zebrowski empties

morrow shambling

hamilton cpt future

beckett genesis

meller evo rx


kurzweil transcend

sawyer wake

ness knife never letting go

barzak love we share

mcewan cement garden

holland sci-fi art

gladwell outliers

bittman food matters

baggini what's it all about

Still in progress:

ross rest is noise

aldiss billion year spree

pollan omnivore's dilemma

Mark R. Kelly

The opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of Mark R. Kelly, and do not reflect the editorial position of Locus Magazine.
Latest Posts

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?