<$BlogRSDUrl$>


Monday, July 28, 2008

Toying with Redesign 

Inspired by recent comments and e-mails I've been rethinking the design of the Locus Online homepage, and supporting pages, the past couple weeks -- the sort of rethinking that's appropriate every couple three years anyway. It's been a year since the homepage was widened to include box ads in the right margin; and roughly three years since the current homepage color scheme and drop-down menus were introduced.

Since I've gotten absolutely no comments to my previous post that invited comments or suggestions about such a redesign, I feel free to do whatever I want.

I'm considering a couple options. Both would reorganize the archive links in an attempt to better make site content more findable, along the lines of the site's logo subtitle, and introduce some gradient graphics to give the site an up-to-date look. One alternative would completely retain the blog-like homepage, while a second option -- an option I experimented with back in 2005, and find myself drawn to once again -- would remove fly-out menus and place instead directory boxes of various site category contents down the homepage, with only a handful of recent posts at the top... making the entire site contents more visible, hopefully. Not sure I'll finish either version and make a decision in the next week...

Because in a week I'll be leaving for Denver, and the Worldcon. I'm not on the program and have only a couple appointments; will be around for the entire con, probably hanging out at the Locus table in the Dealers Room part of the time, and would be happy to chat with anyone reading this blog...

Meanwhile, have read quite a few interesting books lately (see sidebar thumbnails) and will post comments about them, sooner or later.
Comments:
Hi Mark,

I dunno - I'm having trouble visualizing exactly how these changes would look, so I can't vote on them. Any thoughts to having mock-ups we can throw bricks at?

My only real thought on the Locus home page at the moment is that it still looks a little narrow on both my work and home monitors. But it looks like it was designed for 1024x768, so I can't really complain.

- John
 
Narrow? Hmm. I tend to go about as wide as my major benchmarks -- sites like CNN, Slate, et al -- and no farther; I persist in fixed-width designs. Mock-ups: OK, here the 2005 design study, where the idea is to highlight just a couple three of the latest items at the top, followed by categorized headlines. Easy to see a lot at a glance. A tad like CNN, or now Sci Fi Weekly, though I don't think it looked as it does now in 2005.

After a day's more experimentation, I've rejected this line of design, simply because we're now committed to four ad spots on the homepage, and the ad sizes are so *large* that they would overwhelm the tight compact 2005 mock-up.

So now I'm going with this 2008 mod, with gradient graphics and site content packed into four categories of menus at the top. Center pane posts will then always be preceded by category/subcategory headings, to reinforce the underlying structure. Eventually will rework post pages, though if I can redo center pane posts in the next two days, I'll be tempted to post this redesign of the homepage before I leave for Worldcon...
 
Post a Comment


king under the dome

doctorow makers

banks transition

kress steal sky

atwood year flood

roberts yellow blue tibia

wilson julian comstock

 ness ask and answer

collins catching fire

collins hunger games

sawyer flashforward

baker hotel

disch proteus

tan tales

mazzucchelli asterios

zebrowski empties

morrow shambling

hamilton cpt future

beckett genesis

meller evo rx

bsg2

kurzweil transcend

sawyer wake

ness knife never letting go

barzak love we share

mcewan cement garden

holland sci-fi art

gladwell outliers

bittman food matters

baggini what's it all about

Still in progress:

ross rest is noise

aldiss billion year spree

pollan omnivore's dilemma



Mark R. Kelly
Profile
Email

The opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of Mark R. Kelly, and do not reflect the editorial position of Locus Magazine.
Locus
Links
Latest Posts
Archives

  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?