<$BlogRSDUrl$>


Tuesday, September 25, 2007

And Then I Read: Matheson and Finney 

Having read Matheson's I Am Legend, as discussed previous post, and fond of patterns and linkages and serendipidous discoveries of which book I *could* read next (especially, it seems, when it confounds thought-out plans of what I *should* be reading), and perhaps also in reaction to the rather challenging effort of reading (for review in Locus Magazine) the VanderMeer/VanderMeer-edited Best American Fantasy anthology the past couple weeks, I discovered additional 1950s novels that inspired classics films and which I had never read and which I had copies of on my shelves... (Reader, always assure your nonreading friends that you will get around to reading all your books someday). And so I then read Jack Finney's Invasion of the Body Snatchers -- which I'd never read despite having seen three of the four film adaptations -- and then back to Matheson for The Incredible Shrinking Man. (Confounding the pattern in one dimension if not another, I also read the book version of David Gerrold's The Martian Child, since that too is the basis for an upcoming film this fall.)

Quick reactions: I couldn't help but notice similarities between Matheson's protagonists. Both highly emotional, given to rages of frustration and self-deprecation, both frank (if not explicit, given the times) in acknowledging their frustrated needs for female companionship (the theme is expressed passingly in The Omega Man). Especially with Shrinking Man -- the character's emotionality is just another way in which I can only imagine Isaac Asimov, if he read the book, must have rolled his eyes; the scientific plausibility, and the main character's emotional response, are both light years away from the Asimov approach.

And so then... I discovered I had this pint-sized paperback edition of an early Finney collection, The Third Level, on my shelves. (Reader...) And so I'm now about half way through that. The surprising recurrent theme here is -- the longing for the simpler past. Expressed in stories written in the early '50s, for the era of 1894! Some things, perhaps, never change.
Comments:
Mark,
Thanks for your interesting observations. Your point re Asimov is well-taken. The relative absence of emotionality in his work is one of his greatest weaknesses as a writer. Younger readers, his principal fan base, naturally care little about such things. They respond mainly to his ideas and wide-ranging canvas. But older folks require some recognition of the human element, which Asimov provided only sparingly. I think this is one reason a lot of us have found his work less satisfying with the passage of time.
Finney, of course, was a very different sort of writer. His characters are quite recognizably human, behaving very much like us or people we know. He was particularly good at portraying this at shorter lengths, as I'm sure you realize by now in your reading of "The Third Level." He had some trouble sustaining similarly good characterization and thematic elements at novel length. In fact, the movie version of "Body Snatchers" is better at this than the book. A couple of exceptions are the novels "Marion's Wall" and "The Woodrow Wilson Dime." They are consistently interesting and entertaining in much the same way as his short stories, and are very much worth seeking out.
 
Post a Comment


king under the dome

doctorow makers

banks transition

kress steal sky

atwood year flood

roberts yellow blue tibia

wilson julian comstock

 ness ask and answer

collins catching fire

collins hunger games

sawyer flashforward

baker hotel

disch proteus

tan tales

mazzucchelli asterios

zebrowski empties

morrow shambling

hamilton cpt future

beckett genesis

meller evo rx

bsg2

kurzweil transcend

sawyer wake

ness knife never letting go

barzak love we share

mcewan cement garden

holland sci-fi art

gladwell outliers

bittman food matters

baggini what's it all about

Still in progress:

ross rest is noise

aldiss billion year spree

pollan omnivore's dilemma



Mark R. Kelly
Profile
Email

The opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of Mark R. Kelly, and do not reflect the editorial position of Locus Magazine.
Locus
Links
Latest Posts
Archives

  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?