Monday, June 04, 2007

Quills Scope 

I'd say the finalists for this year's Quill Awards -- by McDonald, Marusek, Walton, MacLeod, and Rothfuss -- are better representative of the field than the bestseller-oriented selections in the previous two years... and would attribute this to the removal of open voting to the public to determine the nominees. On the other hand, the current procedure amounts to the award being a function of Publishers Weekly magazine, whose editors and reviewers determine the finalists.

But what struck me about the list is the selection of categories. There is, most glaringly, no science category.... Apparently, the awards intention to "honor the most entertaining and enlightening titles" includes religion/spirituality, and cooking, and health/self-improvement, and sports, and even poetry (!), but not books about science or technology...
Comments: Post a Comment

king under the dome

doctorow makers

banks transition

kress steal sky

atwood year flood

roberts yellow blue tibia

wilson julian comstock

 ness ask and answer

collins catching fire

collins hunger games

sawyer flashforward

baker hotel

disch proteus

tan tales

mazzucchelli asterios

zebrowski empties

morrow shambling

hamilton cpt future

beckett genesis

meller evo rx


kurzweil transcend

sawyer wake

ness knife never letting go

barzak love we share

mcewan cement garden

holland sci-fi art

gladwell outliers

bittman food matters

baggini what's it all about

Still in progress:

ross rest is noise

aldiss billion year spree

pollan omnivore's dilemma

Mark R. Kelly

The opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of Mark R. Kelly, and do not reflect the editorial position of Locus Magazine.
Latest Posts

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?